"Novelties About Novelty and Obviousness Even for Experienced Patent Prosecutors," by Malgorzata (“Gosia”) Kulczycka and Eric-Michael Dokter; AIPLA Live Webinar Series, January 28, 2021
“The Intersection of Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property: Hot Buttons in 2020,” The Knowledge Group/The Knowledge Congress Live Webcast Series, July 2020
"Modeling Learning and Cooperation in Iterative Games," SLAM Undergraduate Research Online (SIURO) 6, 2013. n. pag 8 May 2103. Web.
“Comparison of Patent Prosecution Processes in the US and Europe - Clarity, Support and Amendments,” by Malgorzata (“Gosia”) Kulczycka and Eric-Michael Dokter; AIPLA Live Webinar Series, Summer 2020
There are many differences between patent prosecution practice before the USPTO and patent prosecution practice before the EPO.
In many situations, these differences are significant and impact the patent application drafting process. Furthermore, these differences are often dynamic and vary not just between the drafting processes in each of the jurisdictions, but also within each jurisdiction!
Some of these differences are rooted in ever-changing patent law; others are rooted in each jurisdiction’s idiosyncrasies. For instance, the standards for determining subject matter eligibility may change not only within each jurisdiction, but also from one jurisdiction to another.
This webinar provides a review of some of the differences between the practice before the USPTO and before the EPO. The webinar also attempts to provide some guidance to patent prosecutors to avoid prosecution pitfalls in both jurisdictions.
Presented by: Malgorzata Kulczycka of Hickman Becker Bingham Ledesma LLP, and Eric-Michael Dokter of VJP mbB, Germany, and VJP LLP.
For details, view the official site page here.
“Comparison of Patent Prosecution Processes in the US and Europe - Patent Eligibility," by Malgorzata (“Gosia”) Kulczycka and Eric-Michael Dokter; AIPLA Live Webinar Series, Spring 2020